New Sakshi sandboxes are live. Try agent governance on synthetic data, in your browser. Get a sandboxarrow_forward
witnessGovernment

Automated decisions citizens can question, and you can answer.

When an algorithm decides a benefit, a subsidy, or a grievance outcome, the citizen has a right to ask why. Sakshi records every automated decision on a tamper-evident chain, exports the answer in an RTI-ready form, and lets anyone recompute the evidence, so accountability does not depend on trusting the department.

What Sakshi governs

Public accountability, built into the decision

how_to_vote

Benefits & entitlements

Eligibility and disbursement agents, with the reasons and inputs on the record for every citizen outcome.

support_agent

Grievance & citizen services

Automated triage and responses, witnessed and bounded so contested calls reach a human.

fact_check

RTI & audit exports

Point-wise, source-cited answers about any automated decision, verifiable and severable so identifiers never leak.

Built for scrutiny

Evidence a citizen, an auditor, or the CAG can check

Every decision is hashed into a chain anyone can recompute, and exports are severable by design: the proof holds up without the personal data. It is the same tamper-evident engine that maps BFSI to RBI, pointed at the public's right to an explanation.

Make automated public decisions answerable

Try it with synthetic data, or talk to our team about your programs.