India's government agencies are deploying AI agents that process applications, route grievances, and determine scheme eligibility for 1.4 billion citizens. The shift from static models to autonomous agents changes the governance problem entirely. Every agent decision is a matter of public accountability.
Four Gaps That Define the Problem
The Grievance Agent Gap
7.6 crore complaints on CPGRAMS in a single year — spanning pension delays, land disputes, ration card irregularities. Agents are being deployed to classify and route these grievances, but citizens can't see how routing decisions are made. An RTI request asking why a complaint was deprioritised gets no answer.
The Document Agent Gap
Over 2.5 crore passport applications annually, each requiring document verification across India's fragmented identity ecosystem — Aadhaar, PAN, voter IDs in 12+ scripts, handwritten ration cards. Agents automate verification, but when an application is rejected, no citizen can trace why.
The Eligibility Agent Gap
350+ central and state schemes with overlapping eligibility criteria. A farmer in Madhya Pradesh might qualify for six schemes but know about one. When an eligibility agent denies a benefit, it must be explainable under RTI — in a country where scheme benefits mean the difference between food security and hunger.
The Governance Gap
No central registry of agents across departments. No reasoning capture for agent decisions. No fairness monitoring across caste, gender, or regional demographics. When an agent denies a widow's pension or deprioritises a tribal community's grievance, no one can reconstruct why.
This isn't a technology problem. It's an agent operations problem. The agents work. The democratic accountability infrastructure doesn't exist.
