Indian finance has moved beyond static ML models. Autonomous agents now reason, decide, and act: approving credit, flagging fraud, verifying identities. The shift from model inference to agent autonomy changes the governance problem entirely.
Four Gaps That Define the Problem
The Credit Agent Gap
480 million Indians have never had a formal credit product. Agents are pricing risk for populations no model was trained on — using alternative data, reasoning across multiple signals, approving or denying without human review. Who audits their reasoning?
The Fraud Agent Gap
21.7 billion UPI transactions in January 2026 alone. Digital payment fraud surged 400%+ to Rs 14.57 billion in FY24. Fraud agents must reason across SIM swap attacks, mule networks, and social engineering in regional languages — at 8,300 transactions per second.
The Governance Gap
No central registry of agents or their autonomy levels. No reasoning capture for agent decisions. No policy enforcement at the agent layer. When an agent denies a crop loan in rural Maharashtra, no one can trace why.
The Regulatory Gap
RBI's FREE-AI framework — 7 Sutras, 26 recommendations — demands board-level AI governance, continuous monitoring, and explainability. Most regulated entities haven't read the framework. Fewer still can comply with it.
This isn't a technology problem. It's an agent operations problem. The agents work. The governance doesn't exist.
