Every enterprise department is deploying its own agents — credit agents in lending, fraud agents in payments, customer service agents in support, compliance agents in legal. Without a central registry, there's no visibility into what agents exist, what autonomy they have, or what decisions they're making. The governance gap isn't hypothetical — it's already the default state at most large Indian enterprises.
Four Gaps That Define the Problem
Shadow Agent Gap
Departments are spinning up agents independently — procurement agents, HR screening agents, customer service bots, compliance checkers. No central IT team has a complete inventory. When the CISO asks how many agents are active, nobody can answer.
Governance Gap
No central registry of agents or their autonomy levels. No reasoning capture for agent decisions. No policy enforcement at the agent layer. When an agent rejects a vendor application or flags an employee, no one can trace why.
Accountability Gap
The DPDP Act 2023 makes the deploying entity accountable for AI-driven decisions — not the vendor. If your enterprise's agent denies a service, rejects a claim, or flags a customer, your organisation owns that outcome legally.
Cost Control Gap
Token spend is invisible across departments. No chargeback models. No cost-per-decision tracking. Duplicate agents across teams solving the same problem with different models, different prompts, and no shared infrastructure.
This isn't a technology problem. It's an agent operations problem. The agents work. The governance doesn't exist.
